Friday, November 20, 2009

Cross Eyed

I don’t think I’m dyslexic at all, but I commonly mistake for sale ads that mention gearbag sales for garbage sales. Once I figure it out and click on the ad, most of the time, the items are garbage as far as I’m concerned, but that’s beside the point.

The other thing I’m constantly getting fooled with is “pimp marker”. Being a pump enthusiast, I don’t know how many times I’ve been let down to find out that the new ad for a pump is actually somebody’s glossy space gun. Oh well. Guess I’ll just keep working on my reading comprehension.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

NPL - Hit or Flop?

68 Caliber.com (http://68caliber.com/) has been slowly releasing information on a new paintball league that Steve Davidson along with a few other "oldtimers" have been wroking on for a little while. The name National Pump League was released today. Details are still sketchy (gotta build the suspense somehow) as to exact format and who is involved, but so far it looks like it will be 10-man pump played in the woods. Real oldtime stuff. Might even be stick feed only, but like I said, details are sketchy. Sounds like there will be regional tourneys from what I have disseminated, with possible national finals?

I'm old enough to have played in those types of tournaments, but I wasn't actually playing paintball at all during those times, so I can only read about how things were. But being strictly a modified stock class player (yeah I use constant air) it's still of interest for me.

There has been a push of course in recent years off the small speedball fields and into the woods. My question is; Is this going too far? Is there really enough interest to make this a viable enterprise or just wishful thinking of a few oldtimers wishing to relive their youth?

I wish Steve and whoever else is involved much success with this and I will most likely even endorse taking part, just because I know that those who do take part will surely have fun. I know I don't have the time or energy to personally get involved with a team, but have no problem doing what I can to help promote any form of paintball that I know to be fun. I just thought I would post this to see what early reactions are. We'll get more reactions once all the details are released, but since this is being released in bits and pieces, early speculation is just going to happen. So what do people think?

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Who Pays for Professional Sports?

This entry is going to stray a bit from my usual highly interesting stuff regarding recreational paintball fields to something that I’m not really involved in, but still have an opinion about. Since I’m the one in control of the “Publish Post” button, I can do that.

Professional athletes playing in professional leagues, by definition (or at least the way I define it) get paid. Usually the pay is in the currency of the country they are playing in (although Canadian hockey players playing for Canadian teams in the NHL apparently negotiate in US dollars). This money comes from funds the team acquires (the sales the team makes).

Professional athletes also get paid by others to endorse products. This may mean that an athlete gets money (and sometimes products) just for allowing his/her name to be used by a certain corporation. Athletes may also get more involved and be part of commercials or advertisements. I’m sure all this is negotiated beforehand, but nevertheless, athletes make money from these activities.

Those are two main revenue streams for athletes that I, as an outsider, can easily see. There may be other minor ones, but these are definitely the major ones and realistically, only a very small percentage of elite athletes are probably making money by lending their name and/or image.

Both the teams and companies must obviously see value in these arrangements. Both teams and companies (retailers and manufacturers) operate as businesses and try to make a profit. Some teams may be led by an egocentric billionaire, but I’m sure that even most of those would rather make money than lose money.

So where do these corporations (teams and companies) get their revenue from? Well that would be you and me (and anyone else that might be interested in sports). Directly or indirectly we are paying these athletes by viewing their competitions and by buying the products from the companies paying the athletes for their endorsements. We either watch them in awe and are willing to pay for that opportunity, or we are buying the gear in the hopes that we can be a little more like them. If we are watching them, we don’t necessarily have to be involved in the sport. I watch lots of sports that I have never participated in, or even had a desire to try. Nevertheless, if I am viewing the sport, I’m helping pay for the athlete’s compensation, even if it’s just bolstering the ratings on TV, which allows the network to pay the leagues and can then sell advertising at higher prices to companies who can then pay for the athlete’s endorsements.

We all know how it works. The point I am trying to make is that without viewers and people buying the gear and equipment, there would be no professional sports and no professional athletes.

So how does paintball fit into the discussion? Paintball has pro players. At least that is what they are called. I assume a pro paintball player is being compensated for his/her efforts in some way. Since I have not heard of teams or leagues compensating any players with monetary funds in any meaningful way (I’m sure there might be a little of this going on but there is no real revenue stream from viewers in paintball)), I assume that “pro” paintball players are getting compensated by companies with products or even monetary contributions from these companies. I am sure that a big part of those contributions have been and still are paintballs. It doesn’t matter what it is, the point is that these companies must see value in paying pro players (directly or through their teams). The value comes from selling their products to others, like you and me. We see the pros and want to be like them, or at least want to use similar gear playing the game the pros play.

What happens then when there are less and less people who want to be like the pros and less and less people who want to use the gear the pros are using? The short answer, the funds dry up. The companies don’t have the funds available to pay for the endorsements and the companies may not see as much value in providing the endorsements at all.

This is why the money from Paintball Industry to pay for pro paintball has decreased over the last few years. Without new players entering the game at the very bottom, there is no one to advertise to and to try to impress with the awesomeness of pro paintball. So the focus has switched for much of Paintball industry. Money spent by paintball industry has to see a return of some sort. The focus now is, or at least should be, trying to attract new people into paintball, at the lowest level. So the question I ask is, how well is Paintball Industry doing this? What are they doing to make this happen and what can they do? Do they have the resources, knowledge and the ability to even do anything meaningful? I guess time will tell. In the meantime, Pro Paintball will continue to bleed, as will the rest of the paintball industry.